implementation-governance-en
Most CFOs assume that once a technology project starts, control naturally shifts to IT or consultants. In reality, the success of any digital transformation depends on how well Finance keeps ownership — not just of the budget, but of the vision, governance, and value delivery. 1. Where Control Is Lost In
implementation-governance-en
In every ERP implementation, one of the biggest sources of tension isn’t the technology — it’s unclear accountability. Who’s supposed to approve the solution design? Who signs off on data migration? Who leads cutover readiness? These questions often surface too late — during go-live chaos. That’s why we
security-en
Introduction — Why Security Role Design Is a Governance Issue Many organizations treat ERP security as a technical step done late in the project. In reality, security design reflects organizational accountability — it defines who can act, who can approve, and who is accountable for what. A poorly structured model leads to
ERP Governance
Most ERP projects don’t fail because of technology. They fail because no one is accountable. Without clear roles, escalation paths, and a culture of trust, projects collapse under bottlenecks, blind spots, and finger-pointing. From real experience in large-scale ERP/D365 transformations, here are the governance lessons you can’t
ERP Roles and Responsibilities
Implementing an ERP system is not just an IT exercise — it’s a full-scale business transformation. When roles are unclear, projects stall, decisions drag, and adoption suffers. When they’re well-defined, you get accountability, speed, and alignment. For a full overview of the ERP journey, see: ERP Implementation Journey — Design